License applied to that include "or (at your option) any later version":
#Qmapshack report bug code
The QT code included in qmapshack is taken from the QT examples, and the Which includes "or (at your option) any later version". Projects are verbatim copies of the licenses as published by the FSF The LICENSE.GPL and LICENSE.LGPL files included in QT To in the header, but these are not included in qmapshack as they are in QT projects include the LICENSE.GPL and LICENSE.LGPL files as referred The FSF include "or (at your option) any later version" GPL-3+ applies.
#Qmapshack report bug full
The full license text is not included in the header, but is deferred to ** ensure the GNU General Public License version 3.0 requirements will be ** Foundation and appearing in the file LICENSE.GPL included in the
#Qmapshack report bug software
** General Public License version 3.0 as published by the Free Software ** Alternatively, this file may be used under the terms of the GNU ** version 1.1, included in the file LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt in this package. These rights are described in the Digia Qt LGPL Exception ** In addition, as a special exception, Digia gives you certain additional ** ensure the GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1 requirements Please review the following information to ** Foundation and appearing in the file LICENSE.LGPL included in the
** General Public License version 2.1 as published by the Free Software ** Alternatively, this file may be used under the terms of the GNU Lesser ** GNU Lesser General Public License Usage Refers to the license as published by the FSF which does include it: The license header in the artifact doesn't state the "or later", but > datapoint anyway, as the only thing that counts is the text in the (However, this would be only an addtional, non-authoritive > (looks like the source of the file), and on > say "other packages using QT do it this way". > As licenses are bound to the specific artifact, it is very dangerous to > so the AND evaluated to false and it does not apply. > The files in question do *NOT* have the "any later version" specified, > conditions either of that version or of any later version published by > later version", you have the option of following the terms and > specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any > "Each version is given a distinguishing version number. > Later in the license the or-later-option is introduced: As there is no no-later veision of the license file, > so one can be sure that it is not modified for the purpose to have the > of this license document, but changing it is not allowed." > "Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies You cannot refer to the published complete license text > projects contain "or (at your option) any later version".
> Furthermore the LICENSE.LGPL and LICENSE.GPL files contained in QT > licenses as published by the FSF which contain the "or later" part. The QT project licensing page links to the > Regarding the patch: I'm not near a PC right now, so can't check: Are you sure the license of those files with the exception had a "or later" on their GPL option? > On Sun, at 23:57 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: Reply-to: Sebastiaan Couwenberg, In-reply-to:.
0 kommentar(er)
